The UK government has announced a substantial 9.8% increase in the national minimum wage, raising it to £11.44 per hour from April 2024. This move positions the UK's minimum wage as one of the highest among advanced economies, as a share of average earnings. The announcement was made by Chancellor Jeremy Hunt ahead of the Autumn Statement, signalling a commitment to addressing income inequality and improving the livelihoods of millions of workers.

This increase is set to directly benefit approximately 2.7 million workers, marking a significant step in the government's efforts to uplift low-paid workers. Jeremy Hunt

told the Conservative Party at last month’s annual conference of his intentions to increase the minimum wage to at least £11 pounds an hour, which is part of a goal to raise it to two thirds of average earnings. He noted that the National Living Wage has played a crucial role in reducing the number of people on low pay since 2010.

One noteworthy aspect of this wage hike is the inclusion of workers aged 21 and 22, who will now be entitled to the full minimum wage for the first time. This policy shift is a positive step toward ensuring fair compensation for younger workers, acknowledging the financial challenges they face.

As of now, the National Living Wage in the UK stands at £10.42 per hour for workers aged 23 and over and the minimum wage for 21 and 22-year-olds is set at £10.18. With the proposed increase, a full-time employee aged 23 can expect an annual pay rise of £1,800, while a 21-year-old will see a substantial £2,300 increase per year, representing an approximate 30% boost in their income.

The confirmed raises translate to a 9.8% increase for those aged 23 and over compared to the previous year, showcasing the government's dedication to ensuring that wage growth keeps pace with the cost of living. Workers aged 22 and 21 will experience an even more remarkable 12.4% jump in their minimum wages, reflecting a commitment to improving the financial well-being of younger members of the workforce.

Workers aged 18 to 20 and apprentices will also witness an increase in their minimum wages. Apprentices will experience a significant rise in their hourly rates, jumping from £5.28 to £6.40.

In addition to benefiting individual workers, this policy shift is expected to have positive implications for the broader economy. By addressing income inequality and boosting the purchasing power of low-paid workers, the government aims to contribute to economic stability and growth. However, the decision comes at a time when the Bank of England has expressed concerns about the rapid pace of wage growth - which reached around 8% earlier in the year - posing challenges to returning inflation to its 2% target.

In a landmark victory, Emma Bond - the first female commander of Derry City and Strabane - has been awarded over £31,000 in a sex discrimination case against the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI). The tribunal found her claims to be "well founded," shedding light on an incident during the early days of the pandemic.

Emma Bond, a former PSNI Chief Superintendent and recipient of an MBE for service to policing in 2019, found herself at the centre of controversy when she raised concerns about officers working from home during the first lockdown while still receiving their salaries. The officers claimed they were on stand-by from home but Bond confronted them, leading to a series of complaints against her.

Four officers filed complaints against Bond, alleging her behaviour was "humiliating, intimidating, and degrading." One complaint even resulted in a notice for potential misconduct, although it was later withdrawn.

Following this, Bond informed Chief Constable Simon Byrne about derogatory remarks made about her involvement with the Women in Policing Association - which she co-founded in 2007 and chaired until 2021 - and the tribunal was given evidence of misogynistic WhatsApp messages from junior staff.

Despite her commendable 23-year career in the PSNI, Bond was later transferred to a role in the police training college against her wishes. The justification given was concern over her two-hour commute, yet her male replacement faced no such relocation, raising questions about the fairness of the decision.

Following a protracted tribunal process that began in January, the Belfast tribunal concluded that Bond's claim of sex discrimination was "well founded." The ruling also acknowledged that she had been subjected to detriment for making protected disclosures and the tribunal noted that Bond was treated less favourably than a hypothetical male comparator, emphasizing the existence of gender bias within the organisation.

Bond is now an assistant Chief Constable with Police Scotland.

The festive season is almost upon us and with it comes the age-old tradition of Secret Santa in workplaces across the UK. A recent survey conducted by UK Money Bloggers - a network of over 400 personal finance bloggers and influencers - has shed light on the mixed sentiments surrounding this annual ritual.

While 33% of employees are gearing up for the exchange of surprise gifts, a significant 30% would rather opt out. The findings also reveal a staggering £60 million+ in wasted presents, as 36% of participants anticipate giving away the gifts they receive.

Of the 1,167 employees surveyed, 29% admitted to dreading the task of buying gifts for specific colleagues. Similarly, an equal percentage expressed discomfort at the prospect of opening their presents in front of their coworkers. An additional challenge revealed by the survey is the 24% of respondents who have had to buy a gift for a colleague they've never even spoken to.

The pitfalls of Secret Santa don't end there; a whopping 36% of workers have received what they consider to be a 'bad' Secret Santa gift. From used candles to household items like laundry baskets and washing-up gloves, the list of less-than-ideal presents is extensive. Groceries also made their way into the mix, with mouldy Turkish Delight, an apple, mayonnaise, a cabbage, a jar of Bovril and an already-open bag of sweets topping the list of disappointing gifts!

Amidst the rising cost of living, 72% of employees are calling for changes to the traditional workplace Secret Santa. A third (31%) advocate for smaller donation limits, considering the average budget per person was £15.50. Remarkably, 22% expressed a preference for donating that money to charity instead, potentially redirecting an estimated £37 million towards UK charities.

In response to the survey findings and as a compassionate alternative to traditional Secret Santa, Smart Money People and the UK Money Bloggers community have partnered with the children's charity KidsOut. The goal is to shift the focus from mere 'gifting' to impactful 'giving.'

KidsOut is a children's charity dedicated to supporting disadvantaged children across the UK. Many of these children have escaped domestic violence or live in poverty, often leaving their homes in haste and abandoning all their possessions. By encouraging employees to contribute to KidsOut instead of participating in traditional Secret Santa exchanges, the initiative aims to make a meaningful difference in the lives of those who need it most.

To find out how to donate here.

In a recent survey conducted by Isio in collaboration with YouGov, a comprehensive analysis of 7,674 UK private sector employees has shed light on the pivotal role of employee benefits packages in reducing turnover. The UK - grappling with one of the highest voluntary employee turnover rates in Europe - has seen 27% of employees opting to leave their jobs between 2020 and 2021.

The survey uncovered a compelling correlation between financial confidence and expected employee turnover. Those who exhibited financial confidence in decision-making were 69% more likely to stay with their current employer, compared to 64% in the wider population. Conversely, individuals with less financial confidence were 32% more likely to seek alternative employment, compared to 26% in the broader workforce.

Beyond financial education and support, the findings prompt a closer examination of what additional measures can be implemented to address turnover within a workforce.

To gauge the impact of benefits packages on employee satisfaction, the survey asked over 7,500 employees - excluding pay and bonus considerations, whether their current benefits package met their requirements. Alarmingly, over a quarter expressed significant discontent, while an additional 8% admitted to being unaware of their benefits. This dissatisfaction varied considerably across industry sectors.

Employees dissatisfied with their benefits were found to be more inclined to change jobs, with 16% planning to do so, compared to 10% in the wider population. Conversely, those content with their benefits package were less likely to consider moving, with 58% having no plans to change jobs, compared to 40% in the broader workforce.

The survey highlighted significant differences in satisfaction levels across industries. Financial services led the way, with 33% of employees feeling that their benefits met all their needs. However, in hospitality and leisure, this figure dropped to a mere 18%, with an additional 15% uncertain about their benefits.

Several factors contribute to this variance, including the perceived generosity of benefits packages in the financial services sector compared to retail and hospitality. Additionally, the retail and hospitality industries, characterised by a more diverse workforce, often grapple with less inclusive benefit packages.

In light of these findings, there is untapped potential for employers to enhance employee satisfaction with benefits packages and boost financial confidence across the workforce. By ensuring benefits packages meet the diverse needs of employees and fostering an inclusive approach, employers can significantly reduce the risk of turnover.

In June 2023, Ciphr - a UK-based provider of integrated HR, payroll, learning and recruitment solutions - conducted an online survey of 1,000 employed UK adults. The survey aimed to understand the perceptions of what constitutes a meaningful and rewarding career among the workforce. The results provide fascinating insights into the types of professions that people in the UK find most fulfilling and valuable.

Surprisingly, the survey revealed a diverse range of responses, with nearly 220 different job titles cited as meaningful and rewarding. However, some professions consistently stood out as the most highly regarded across the board, suggesting that certain careers hold a special place in the hearts of the UK workforce.

Unsurprisingly, the top three positions on the list of most meaningful and rewarding careers in the UK were occupied by healthcare and education professionals. According to the survey, being a nurse, doctor, or teacher ranked highest, with 86% of the respondents providing qualitative explanations for their choices. These three vocations have long been revered for their contribution to society and their ability to make a positive impact on the lives of others.

Nurses, often referred to as the "backbone of the health service," were commended for their unwavering support and comforting presence during challenging times. Respondents expressed gratitude for the invaluable care and comfort that nurses provide, acknowledging that their work goes beyond monetary compensation.

Doctors, known for their "life-changing skills," were praised for their capacity to improve lives daily. The survey participants recognised the significant impact of doctors in enhancing the well-being of individuals, highlighting the profession's altruistic aspect.

Teachers, too, received widespread acclaim for their dedication to shaping the lives of the next generation. Respondents commended educators for helping young people reach their full potential, emphasising the importance of their role in society.

Interestingly, it's noteworthy that very few respondents mentioned the wages of these caring professions, instead focusing on the non-monetary rewards of the work itself. This indicates that financial incentives aren't the primary motivators for individuals drawn to professions that revolve around helping others.

Furthermore, the survey highlighted that careers associated with caring - such as care workers and midwives - ranked highly on the list, despite not being renowned for high salaries. This reaffirms the idea that people in the UK value the intrinsic rewards and personal satisfaction that come with helping others.

The survey also unveiled the significance of roles in the IT sector, with IT professionals ranking seventh on the list. Given the growing reliance on technology in both personal and professional aspects of life, it's unsurprising that respondents consider this role as meaningful and rewarding. IT professionals play a crucial role in shaping the digital landscape, and their work has a direct impact on society, making their inclusion in the top ten entirely justified.

The top 20 jobs considered the most meaningful and rewarding in the UK, according to the Ciphr survey, are as follows:

• Nurse
• Doctor
• Teacher
• Medical professional
• Care worker
• Midwife
• IT professional
• Charity worker
• Support worker
• Social worker
• Police officer
• Working for the NHS
• Lawyer
• Vet
• Animal care worker
• Manager
• Working with animals
• Customer service manager
• Firefighter
• Education professional
• Paramedic
• Professional footballer

It's also interesting to observe the gender-based differences in the list. The survey revealed that certain professions ranked higher among women - such as midwife, support worker, social worker, charity worker and animal care worker. On the other hand, some roles - including IT professional, manager, police officer, working for the NHS and professional footballer - featured predominantly in the men's top 10. These differences in perception reflect the varied values and preferences of individuals in the workforce.

The Ciphr survey sheds light on the most meaningful and rewarding professions in the UK, with healthcare and education-related roles dominating the top spots. These results highlight the importance of intrinsic rewards and the desire to make a positive impact on society as key factors in people's career choices. It's evident that, for many in the UK, the true value of a profession lies not solely in monetary compensation but in the sense of fulfilment and contribution it offers to others and society as a whole.

The Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE) is conducted in the UK each April. It serves as the most comprehensive source of information about the structure and distribution of earnings across the country. This survey delves into the depths of the UK workforce, providing invaluable insights into the levels, distribution and composition of earnings, as well as paid hours worked. ASHE captures data across various industries, occupations and demographics, offering an in depth understanding of the UK's labour market.

The ASHE data, derived from a 1% sample of employee jobs and employing HM Revenue and Customs Pay As You Earn (PAYE) records, is a crucial tool for policymakers and economists to understand and address the nuances of the labour market.

In the most recent analysis of the ASHE data by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the median weekly earnings for full-time employees in April 2023 demonstrated a significant surge, reaching £682, marking a notable 6.2% increase compared to the figure reported in April 2022 (£642). This spike in earnings growth represents the highest recorded rate since the commencement of comparable records in 1997, pointing to a promising trajectory for the UK's workforce.

However, a deeper dive into the ASHE findings reveals a different narrative. While nominal median weekly earnings witnessed a significant boost, the real terms data -  adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Prices Index including owner occupiers' housing costs (CPIH) - presented a contrasting picture. The report disclosed a 1.5% decline in the real terms median weekly earnings for full-time employees in April 2023 compared to the previous year, indicating a potential discrepancy between nominal earnings growth and the impact of inflation on employees' purchasing power. Both full-time and part-time employees experienced a decrease in real earnings over the year, underscoring the challenges posed by inflation on the UK workforce.

Moreover, the report highlighted distinct patterns in earnings growth across different occupational groups. The data showed a substantial uptick in earnings for lower-paying occupations, with caring, leisure and other service occupations experiencing a 9.4% surge and sales and customer service occupations witnessing a 9.2% rise compared to the previous year. Conversely, the associate professional and technical occupations group displayed the smallest increase at 3.2%, indicating a potential need for targeted interventions to address wage disparities across occupational categories.

Furthermore, the ASHE analysis brought attention to the divergence between the private and public sectors in terms of earnings growth. While the private sector exhibited a robust 7.7% annual percentage growth in median weekly earnings for full-time employees, the public sector recorded a comparatively modest 3.7% growth.

Notably, the gender pay gap, a longstanding concern in the UK labour market, demonstrated a gradual but persistent decline over the years. The ASHE report disclosed a 9.1% increase in median weekly earnings for women, outpacing the 6.8% growth observed among men. Despite these gains, the gender pay gap still persists, with women earning £491 per week compared to men's £666, representing a gender pay gap of 7.7% in April 2023. Notably, the analysis pointed to a significant discrepancy in the gender pay gap across different age groups, indicating the need for targeted policies to address this disparity among employees aged 40 years and over versus those aged under 40 years.

The findings from the ASHE report provide critical insights into the complex dynamics of earnings growth and gender pay disparities within the UK labour market. While the record-breaking increase in median weekly earnings offers a promising outlook, the persistence of the gender pay gap and the challenges posed by inflation emphasise the need for continued efforts to promote equitable remuneration and ensure the financial well-being of all employees across various occupational groups and sectors.

In a recent study conducted by Business technology solutions provider Brother UK, it has become abundantly clear that the meeting culture in UK offices is in need of a revamp. The research - based on a survey of 2,000 office workers - highlighted a growing concern among employees regarding the excessive time wasted in meetings, leading to decreased productivity and frustration.

The findings reveal that a staggering 55% of the surveyed office workers believe they spend too much time in meetings. Even more concerning is the fact that 57% of respondents claimed they only attend one useful meeting per week. These statistics raise questions about the efficiency and purpose of the meetings that take up a significant part of the workday.

It's clear that a significant portion of office workers yearn for shorter meetings. A resounding 81% of respondents believe that shorter calls and catch-ups could achieve the same outcomes, providing them with more time to focus on their actual responsibilities. This desire for brevity highlights a growing consensus among employees that time could be better spent elsewhere.

The study uncovered several common complaints among office workers regarding what hinders productive meetings. The most significant grievances include excessive waffling (59%), too much small talk (48%), latecomers (31%) and individuals not paying attention (31%). Additionally, more than a third (43%) of respondents suspect that their colleagues often attempt to multitask and complete other work during meetings, further undermining their effectiveness.

Brother UK's research also exposed a significant issue with meeting facilitation. Over half of respondents (53%) stated that they regularly attend unengaging and poorly structured meetings. This issue becomes even more pronounced among remote workers, with a staggering 67% expressing their dissatisfaction with the quality of virtual meetings. It is evident that the manner in which meetings are organised and conducted plays a vital role in their effectiveness.

The survey participants also provided insights into the conditions that make meetings more productive. Morning, in-person meetings with strict agendas and action notes were deemed the most effective. This preference for face-to-face meetings was expressed by two-thirds of the respondents (67%), who believed that they are more productive than virtual meetings. This sentiment held true even among staff working remotely, with 57% favouring in-person interactions.

According to the research, timekeeping is of paramount importance to 88% of respondents in holding a productive meeting. Following closely behind is adhering to a strict agenda (78%), circulating action notes (74%), putting away laptops and phones during in-person meetings (73%), and keeping cameras on during virtual meetings (61%). These findings emphasise the significance of structure, discipline and active participation in making meetings worthwhile.

The consequences of drawn-out, unproductive meetings extend beyond wasted time. A significant number of the respondents admitted to feeling frustrated (54%), demotivated (27%), and even thinking less of their colleagues (25%) when meetings overrun or fail to serve their intended purpose. This highlights the importance of addressing the issues in the current meeting culture to maintain a positive and productive work environment.

Phil Jones MBE - Managing Director at Brother UK - stated:

“It’s clear that the UK’s meeting culture still heavily contributes to workplace productivity. Bringing people together will always be an important part of culture, problem-solving, building relationships, and developing new customers. Many meetings could be shorter and provide people with more free time to focus on delivery.”

He added:

“There is still work to do to right the UK’s meeting culture, even in our own business. Greater consideration on time, place, and how to better facilitate calls and catchups will help nurture more productive meetings, more often.”

In collaboration with the Reward and Employee Benefits Association (REBA), Bupa conducted a comprehensive report to gain deeper insights into the lives and experiences of disabled employees, those with long-term or chronic illnesses and individuals with impairments or conditions in the workplace.

The "Disability in the Workplace 2023" report surveyed over 300 employed individuals who identified as belonging to one of these groups. The findings shed light on the challenges they face and the changes required in workplaces to create a more inclusive environment.

The report gathered data in two ways: a survey conducted in June 2023 and a series of virtual round tables and interviews with HR, reward and benefits directors from various sectors.

Survey Results:

Demographics: Of the 580 individuals surveyed, 303 identified as disabled, having a long-term or chronic illness, or having an impairment or condition. For comparison, 277 employees who did not belong to these groups were also surveyed.

Career Progression: Over half (51%) of the respondents from the target groups believed that their disability or health condition served as a barrier to advancing in their careers.

Employer Support: A significant minority (34%) felt that their employers could do more to support them in the workplace.

Willingness to Share: An encouraging 65% of disabled employees expressed their willingness to openly discuss their experiences to help employers better understand their needs.

Flexibility Matters: The top benefit sought by disabled workers to succeed at work was greater flexibility. This included the ability to work remotely, take longer breaks, attend medical appointments, or customise their roles. Alarmingly, fewer than one in five (18%) disabled employees currently have access to flexible working arrangements.

Desired Employee Benefits: The top five benefits desired by disabled employees included income protection (50%), support with everyday health costs (43%), paid counselling or mental health support (43%), a payment if diagnosed with a critical illness (38%) and flexibility in job design (38%).

Key Findings and Implications:

The "Disability in the Workplace 2023" report reveals critical insights that businesses must heed to create more inclusive and supportive workplaces:

Inclusive Culture: A significant portion of disabled employees feel that their disability is a barrier to career progression. This underscores the importance of businesses fostering inclusive cultures where employees feel empowered and supported.

Communication and Engagement: Employees are willing to share their experiences, indicating a desire for open dialogue and communication. Businesses should actively engage with their workforce to better understand their unique needs.

Flexibility is Paramount: Greater flexibility in work arrangements is a top priority for disabled employees. Businesses should explore flexible working options to accommodate medical appointments and diverse work needs.

Desired Employee Benefits: The top five desired benefits highlight the importance of financial security and support for everyday health and mental well-being. Businesses should consider offering these benefits to help their employees live healthier and happier lives.

Career Barriers: It is essential to recognise that disabled employees perceive their conditions as more significant barriers to career development compared to those with long-term or chronic illnesses. This distinction emphasises the need for tailored support and accommodations.

The "Disability in the Workplace 2023" report - a collaborative effort between Bupa and REBA - illuminates the challenges faced by disabled employees, individuals with long-term or chronic illnesses, impairments, or conditions. It highlights the need to create a more inclusive and supportive work environment where employees can thrive and progress in their careers. Greater flexibility, open communication and tailored employee benefits are essential steps in making the workplace better for all, regardless of their abilities or health conditions. Businesses that act on these findings will not only benefit their employees but also foster a more diverse and inclusive workforce.

In a bid to address concerns surrounding the UK's pension system, a groundbreaking charter entitled "Building a Consensus for Better Pensions" has been endorsed by prominent organisations, calling for substantial reforms and improvements to ensure the creation of a fair and affordable pension system.

Spearheaded by the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA), the charter seeks to unite political parties, encouraging them to commit to comprehensive pension reform in their upcoming general election manifestos. This ambitious initiative is driven by the belief that everyone in the UK deserves a secure and comfortable retirement.

The charter outlines several critical objectives to revolutionise the UK's retirement savings system. First and foremost, it advocates for the establishment of clear and attainable goals for the country's pension landscape. These objectives encompass state pensions, workplace pensions and personal pensions, with the overarching aim of ensuring that they are not just adequate but also fair and affordable for all citizens.

One of the charter's pivotal propositions is the call for a universal state pension designed to safeguard individuals from poverty, thereby ensuring that basic needs are met in retirement. This move is deemed essential as the state pension plays a vital role in the financial well-being of a significant portion of the population.

Moreover, the charter places emphasis on broadening the scope of retirement savings to encompass traditionally underserved groups. This includes the self-employed, gig economy workers, individuals holding multiple jobs, low earners, women and ethnic minority groups. By addressing the specific challenges faced by these demographics, the charter aims to make pensions more inclusive and accessible.

The charter has garnered support from a diverse group of signatories, including Age UK, the Association of British Insurers (ABI), the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) and others. These organisations share a common vision of achieving a pension system that caters to the unique needs and aspirations of the UK's population.

Robert Yuille - the ABI's Assistant Director and Head of Long-Term Savings - emphasised the importance of establishing a long-term strategy rooted in consensus. He believes that the Better Pensions Charter provides a blueprint to secure a high standard of living for all in their retirement years.

Nigel Peaple - Director of Policy & Advocacy at the PLSA - reiterated the urgency of reforming the UK's pension system. While acknowledging the progress made over the past two decades, he stressed that a considerable portion of the population is still far from attaining a satisfactory retirement income.

Despite recent extensions to auto-enrollment, the charter's supporters argue that more changes are required to meet the evolving needs of pension savers. With the impending general election on the horizon, these organisations are rallying political parties to commit to vital reforms, echoing the call for comprehensive change laid out in the charter.

In the face of economic uncertainty and the challenges posed by the cost of living crisis, protecting the value of the state pension becomes paramount. The charter's vision includes ensuring that this pension remains robust and reliable even during periods of economic turbulence.

Job hunting is often a challenging and time-consuming endeavour, with many obstacles to overcome. But the latest revelation about 'ghost jobs' in the United Kingdom has added a new layer of complexity to this already arduous process.

According to a comprehensive study conducted by StandOut CV - a prominent career and CV expert firm - a staggering 34.4 percent of job advertisements listed online have been identified as 'ghost jobs,' a deceptive practice that leaves job seekers disheartened and frustrated.

Ghost jobs are a disingenuous recruitment practice in which companies create fake job openings for their own benefit. These openings may either never have existed or have already been filled, but the companies leave them posted on job boards to build a pool of candidates for future hiring or to create the illusion of company growth. Unfortunately, this practice means that job seekers often waste valuable time and effort applying for jobs that don't lead to real interviews.

StandOut CV's analysis - led by Director Andrew Fennell - scrutinised a substantial 91,318 job listings across the 30 largest cities, towns and boroughs in the UK. The research focused on the number of jobs posted and those that remained 'live' but had been advertised for '30+ days,' indicating a high probability of being a ghost job. The data, gathered on 19th May 2023, and re-evaluated on 27th June 2023, revealed that over a third of job listings in the UK fell under the 'ghost job' category, highlighting a persistent issue within the job market.

The study also unveiled geographic variations in the prevalence of ghost jobs. The London borough of Islington emerged as the worst area for ghost jobs, with a staggering 26.1 percent of job listings found to be fraudulent. Southend-On-Sea followed closely behind with 23.7 percent of job listings being ghost jobs.

Interestingly, larger cities had a much lower ghost job rate, with London, Edinburgh, and Bristol having some of the lowest percentages of ghost jobs, likely due to a busier job market where jobs are filled faster and better recruiter administration in removing filled job listings.

Certain professions are also more susceptible to encountering ghost job listings than others. Veterinary nurses topped the list as the most likely victims of this deceptive practice, with a startling 59.1 percent of job listings in this sector found to be ghost jobs. Software engineers followed closely behind, with 46.5 percent of job listings in their field identified as fake.

But what drives this concerning trend? Unfortunately, there is no law against ghost job adverts in the UK, but it would not reflect well on a company if they were found to be using them. A 2022 survey found that 50 percent of managers admitted to using ghost job ads to attract more candidates for future job openings, while 43 percent used them to create the illusion of company growth when it wasn't the case. While this practice may benefit recruiters in the short term, it leaves job seekers frustrated and their time and effort wasted on non-existent job opportunities.